38th PLMA Conference Agenda

November 12-14, 2018 in Austin, Texas

38th PLMA Conference in Austin, Texas
Monday, November 12, 2018
Concurrent Events (included in conference registration)
PLMA Interest Group Meetings
8:00 - 9:00 am

Evolution Training & Interest Group Breakfast

9:00 am - 4:30 pm

Evolution of Demand Response to Distributed Energy Resources: Fundamentals and Path Forward
This one-day course explains how today's demand response initiatives are evolving to interact with an emerging future with distributed energy resources for peak load management and much more. The course content expands on the Evolution of Demand Response whitepaper and discussion.

Mark Martinez, Southern California Edison Co-Chair Mark Martinez
Southern California Edison
Christine Riker, Energy Solutions Co-Chair Christine Riker
Energy Solutions

Interest Group Activities
Join the PLMA Interest Groups for candid, interactive roundtables among practitioners from utilities, consultancies, and technology providers who are actively engaged in the load management industry. Don't miss the opportunity to learn from and share with your peers' successes and challenges in these areas of interest.

9:00 am

Women in DM

Melissa Knous, Duke Energy Co-Chair Melissa Knous
Duke Energy
Erika Diamond, EnergyHub Co-Chair Erika Diamond
EnergyHub
Lenore Zeuthen, Zeuthen Management Solutions Co-Chair Lenore Zeuthen
Zeuthen Management Solutions

Who Should Attend? Women and men attending the conference are encouraged to join us for this dynamic conversation.

  • Women – Gain knowledge and perspective on how to develop and further your career in DSM — an industry in which we still see few women in leadership positions. Enhance your network by getting to know other women in the field.
  • Men – Increase your understanding of the issues women face in our industry to: improve your team’s development and synergy, enhance your recruiting and management approach, and learn how to leverage the benefits of greater organizational diversity.
11:00 am

Evolution Training & Interest Group Lunch

12 noon

PLMA International Interest Group Meeting

Scott Coe, GridOptimize Co-Chair Scott Coe
GridOptimize
Ross Malme, EnergyHub Co-Chair Ross Malme
Skipping Stone

Connected Devices

Justin Chamberlain, CPS Energy Co-Chair Justin Chamberlain
CPS Energy
Poornima Eber, National Grid Co-Chair Poornima Eber
National Grid
Olivia Patterson, Opinion Dynamics Co-Chair Olivia Patterson
Opinion Dynamics
2:00 pm

Shared Evolution Training & Interest Group Refreshment Break

2:30 pm

DER Integration

Rich Barone, Hawaiian Electric Company Co-Chair Rich Barone
Hawaiian Electric Company
John Powers, Extensible Energy Co-Chair John Powers
Extensible Energy
Matt Carlson, Aquanta Inc. Co-Chair Matt Carlson
Aquanta

Customer Engagement

Meridith Nierenberg, Orange and Rockland Co-Chair Meridith Nierenberg
Orange and Rockland Utilities
Andrea Simmonsen, Idaho Power Co-Chair Andrea Simmonsen
Idaho Power Company
Sharyn Barata, Opinion Dynamics Co-Chair Sharyn Barata
Opinion Dynamics
4:30 - 5:30 pm

PLMA Evolution Training and Interest Group Networking Meetup
All interest group and training registrants are welcome to attend to network and learn how to make the most of the Conference activities.

6:00 - 8:00 pm

Board of Directors Meeting
Business meeting with working dinner only for Board members and At-Large Representatives listed at www.peakload.org/plma-leadership.

8:00 - 10:00 pm

Welcome Reception
Join your fellow PLMA members for great networking and refreshing beverages. Open to all conference attendees at no additional fee, compliments of PLMA members. Not a member? Join us anyway and see what you're missing.

Electric Power Ally Host: Landis+Gyr

Tuesday, November 13, 2018
 

Conference Co-Chairs

Scott Jarman, Austin Energy Scott Jarman
Austin Energy
Ricardo Luna, CPS Energy Ricardo Luna
CPS Energy
Teague Douglas, CLEAResult Teague Douglas
CLEAResult
7:00 - 8:00 am

Breakfast Buffet in Sponsor Lounge

 

Morning General Session 1

Andrea Simmonsen, Idaho Power Co-Chair Andrea Simmonsen
Idaho Power Company
Teague Douglas, CLEAResult Co-Chair Teague Douglas
CLEAResult
8:00 am Michael Brown, NV Energy

Opening Remarks
PLMA Chair Michael Brown, Berkshire Hathaway, NV Energy

8:30 am

Welcoming Remarks
Local Guest TBA

9:00 am

Reinventing Demand Response with DERs
The industry today is bringing on more renewable and distributed energy resources. As technology advances and more renewable and distributed energy resources continue to come online, there are more options like EV chargers and interactive water heaters, as well as new market drivers to balance supply and demand on the grid to support reliability and capture operational efficiencies. Demand response practitioners are exploring the ability of demand response to fill valleys and clip peaks to respond to fluctuations and overgeneration along the grid.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Obtain a high-level US perspective of the DR utility landscape (based on SEPA's Annual Utility Survey);
  2. Understand from the private and public power perspectives how utilities are leveraging DR to manage fluctuations along the grid; and
  3. Gain insights into the developing uses and values for demand response.
Derek Kirchner, DTE Energy Moderator
Derek Kirchner

DTE Energy
Brenda Chew, Smart Electric Power Alliance Brenda Chew
Smart Electric Power Alliance
Rich Barone, Hawaiian Electric Rich Barone
Hawaiian Electric
Troy Eichenberger, Tennessee Valley Authority Troy Eichenberger
Tennessee Valley Authority
10:00 am

Save or Shift? How to Successfully Transition from EE to DSM/DER
Balancing energy supply and demand is becoming more complex as more intermittent distributed resources are added to the grid. In this environment, DSM planners need to re-examine portfolios to determine how DER technologies fit with existing EE/DSM programs. It requires a granular planning process that considers the hourly load shape of each EE/DSM/DER technology to prioritize program opportunities based on alignment with resource needs. This session discusses an innovative approach to DSM/DER planning used to prepare Tucson Electric Power’s 2019 DSM Plan. TEP created a resource-needs heat map and used technology-specific load shapes to rank all existing EE programs and potential new DER technologies according to their fit with the utility’s marginal generation costs. This enabled TEP to propose a modernized portfolio that realigns existing programs and introduces new DER technologies using an objective method for determining whether to increase, decrease, maintain, modify, or eliminate each existing or potential program.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn what to do when you need to incorporate DERs into your existing EE portfolio.
  2. Understand how to design your DER strategy to meet customer and grid needs.
  3. Objectively evaluate the value of new and existing technologies based on your resource needs.
Ray Martinez, Tucson Electric Power Ray Martinez
Tucson Electric Power
Tom Hines, Tierra Resource Consultants, LLC Tom Hines
Tierra Resource Consultants, LLC
10:30 am

Refreshment Break in Sponsor Lounge

 

Morning General Session 2

Ricardo Luna, CPS Energy Co-Chair Ricardo Luna
CPS Energy
Ruth Kiselewich, ICF Co-Chair Ruth Kiselewich
ICF
11:00 am

Practitioners' Perspectives on The Future of Distributed Energy Resources
Where do the current DR/EE/Renewables activities of utilities fit in a DER future of iDSM, NWA, storage and more. This roundtable discussion will offer utility practitioner perspectives on how Distributed Energy Resources, as an umbrella term, is evolving from a program focus on Peak Load Emergencies to Market/System Economics to Operational Management. This roundtable with include structured dialogue on topics such as:

  • Repositioning utility program resources designed for system-wide deployment to be targeted/locational
  • Business Process Changes Necessary to Evolve DERS from Emergency to Operations
  • Where DR fits in a DER construct relative to utilities that are long on generation with weak market/regulatory signals and potentially-stranded infrastructure costs
  • What is a DERMS and what’s the path to get there; What are individual utility DR Potential Studies not telling senior executives
  • Balancing customer satisfaction and customer acquisition issues
Jason Cigarran, Itron Moderator
Jason Cigarran

Itron
Meridith Nierenberg, Orange and Rockland Utilities Meridith Nierenberg
Orange and Rockland Utilities
Rich Philip, Duke Energy Rich Philip
Duke Energy
Michael Brown, NV Energy Michael Brown
NV Energy
12 noon

Lessons Learned from Six Years of BYOT at Austin Energy
Bring Your Own Thermostat (BYOT) was a new concept when Austin Energy rolled out the Power Partner Thermostat Program in 2012. Six years later, the program is going strong and many of the largest utilities in the country have launched BYOT programs. Scott Jarman from Austin Energy and Chris Ashley from EnergyHub will provide an in-depth retrospective and share data from the life of the program. They will discuss the genesis of this innovative concept in 2012 and Austin Energy’s initial configuration and introduction of the program concept; approaches to manufacturers and vendors engagement; and how the structure of program has evolved over the past six years.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how to create the best possible customer experience.
  2. Understand how to minimize administrative burden and manage multiple partner relationships.
  3. Take away a process for tapping into manufacturers existing customer relationships.
Scott Jarman, Austin Energy Scott Jarman
Austin Energy
Chris Ashley, EnergyHub Chris Ashley
EnergyHub
12:30 pm

Lunch Buffet in Sponsor Lounge

 

Afternoon General Session 1

Brian Doyle, Xcel Energy Co-Chair Brian Doyle
Xcel Energy
Lynn Stein, E Source Co-Chair Lynn Stein
E Source
1:30 pm

Turning the Titanic: Systems Integration to Support 2-Way Switches @ PG&E
When PG&E set out to leverage their AMI network to support the deployment of central AC 2-way direct load control switches, a harsh reality set in: Could they actually turn the Titanic? Standing up more reliable smart grid technology involved complex internal IT projects; multi-year lab tests and a field test; penetration testing; and coordination with vendors associated with device development, AMI network and head-end system, program implementation, IT and the DRMS. This presentation offers a glimpse into what a major U.S. utility had to go through in order to step into the future of a more flexible smart grid technology and make it operationally advanced.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Understand the scope of product development.
  2. Learn strategies for vendor coordination.
  3. Take home an understanding of how to do benchmarking for a major technology shift.
Wendy Brummer, Pacific Gas & Electric Co Wendy Brummer
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
David Fleming, GoodCents/Franklin Energy David Fleming
GoodCents/ Franklin Energy
Darren Gronewold, Energate/Tantalus Darren Gronewold
Energate/ Tantalus
Brian Treu, Itron Brian Treu
Itron
Paul Wyman, Lockheed Martin Energy Paul Wyman
Lockheed Martin Energy
2:00 pm

This is Getting Complicated… Planning DR Resources in a World of DERs
Utility planners used to have just one customer-side resource to worry about: EE. Then, the world expanded to DR. Now we have too many acronym’d resources to say without taking a breath and customers adoption of DER technologies in some jurisdictions is significant enough to move the needle in system planning. This is one of the cruxes of the DER evolution—how can utilities predict the location and timing of thousands of distributed customer adoption decisions that are increasingly occurring outside of the utility’s influence? Potential studies typically have provided the starting point for planning, but now utility planners need to go a step further and forecast the actual adoption of DER, often at highly granular levels. This presentation will discuss the methods and learnings from a utility case study and across the country in the shift towards DER forecasting to feed IRP, distribution planning, and customer engagement.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how utilities are evolving their single-resource DR potential studies to become multi-resource DER forecasts that are more tightly integrated with non-DSM functions at the utility.
  2. Understand new data streams and new analytical methods for incorporating DER into planning (e.g., understanding individual customer propensities to adopt, accounting for interactive effects, etc.).
  3. Take home best practices in cross-silo coordination (e.g., upfront coordination between T&D planners and DER program planners, developing shared customer-facing databases, etc.)
Josh Keeling, PGE Josh Keeling
PGE
Robin Maslowski, Navigant Robin Maslowski
Navigant
2:30 pm

Utility DR Auctions: A Practical Guide
In many ISO/RTOs demand response is primarily procured via capacity auctions; There has been much discussion recently about using market-based mechanisms, such as auctions for DR procurement at the utility level, however there is little practical experience with such auctions; This presentation will talk about theoretical and practical aspects of utility level DR auctions, based on Con Ed’s experience with DR and Demand Management auctions.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn the benefits and drawbacks of utility auction and basic auction design principles.
  2. Understand major differences between wholesale and retail auctions.
  3. Take home the conditions for a successful auction and lessons learned from Con Edison auctions.
Shira Horowitz, Con Edison Shira Horowitz
Con Edison
3:00 pm

Refreshment Break in Sponsor Lounge

 

Afternoon General Session 2

Scott Jarman, Austin Energy Co-Chair Scott Jarman
Austin Energy
Dave Hyland, Zen Ecosystems Co-Chair Dave Hyland
Zen Ecosystems
3:30 pm

Non-Wires Alternatives Projects Worth Watching: Key Insights from SEPA & PLMA Joint Research
Discover key considerations from leading non-wires-alternatives (NWA) projects that are deferring the need for traditional electric grid infrastructure upgrades. Hear results from an industry-wide call for project nominations that led a peer group to select 10 NWA projects that have compelling stories and lessons-learned to share back to the industry; Since 2016, National Grid has identified more than 20 NWA opportunities through its capital investment planning process. This presentation will share some of our learnings regarding project identification, procurement processes, benefit cost analysis tool development and rate case incentives. Con Edison has had many key takeaways and lessons learned from the first large program we are implementing, to the streamlined approach of identifying and implementing newer projects. They have also found different ways to communicate these projects to the market and are working to continuously improve our approach to non-wires solutions, with our customers and market partners in mind.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn about the 10 selected case studies representing non-wires alternative programs around the United States, and how they were selected.
  2. Understand how utilities—and others—are exploring lower cost, higher consumer and environmental benefit solutions with non-wire alternatives.
  3. Take away alternative strategies for utilities to meet changing system needs without traditional transmission and distribution upgrades.
Steve Cowell, E4theFuture Steve Cowell
E4theFuture
Brenda Chew, Smart Electric Power Alliance Brenda Chew
Smart Electric Power Alliance
Tiger Adolf, PLMA Tiger Adolf
PLMA
Anntonette Zembrzuski Alberti, National Grid Anntonette Zembrzuski Alberti
National Grid
Damei Jack, Con Edison Damei Jack
Con Edison
4:30 pm

Sponsor Showcase Lightning Round
In this 30-minute session you will hear from several of our sponsors about the essence of their solutions. Our Co-chairs have vetted the presentations and helped the sponsors get their key messages compressed down to no more than 3 minutes. This is not a marketing pitch, but an educational statement from the sponsors on what they do with specific examples of how they provide value.

Mark Martinez, Southern California Edison Co-Moderator: Mark Martinez
Southern California Edison
Christine Riker, Energy Solutions Co-Moderator: Christine Riker
Energy Solutions

Showcase Presenters:

5:00 - 6:30 pm

Networking Reception in Sponsor Lounge hosted by AutoGrid Systems
A key value to PLMA events is the opportunity to network with conference participants. Join us for a cocktails and appetizers. Come and share what you learned and get additional details about your topics of interest.

Electric Power Ally Host: Landis+Gyr

Wednesday, November 14, 2018
7:30 - 8:30 am

Breakfast Buffet in Sponsor Lounge

Concurrent Breakout Sessions

Track 1

Brian Solsbee, TEMPA Co-Chair Brian Solsbee
TEMPA
Debyani Ghosh, Navigant Co-Chair Debyani Ghosh
Navigant
8:30 am

Electric Vehicles as a Grid Resource: from Here to There
Electric vehicle sales are skyrocketing with California leading the way through policies targeted at reducing transportation-related greenhouse gas emissions. The long-term vision for widespread deployment of EVs and smart charging infrastructure is to enable two-way energy flows to support the grid and to allow for increased penetration of renewables. Realizing this vision depends upon EV owner decisions on where and when they charge and willingness to allow control of their EV batteries. In this session, EV charging patterns and implications for program design to engage customers and to maximize EVs as a grid resource will be explored.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Where and when are people charging electric vehicles and what are the implications for aggregating into a grid resource?
  2. What challenges and opportunities do electric vehicle charging patterns present for energy companies and grid operators?
  3. What are the most effective program design approaches to engage EV owners and to shape usage patterns?
Valerie Nibler, Olivine Valerie Nibler
Olivine

SmartCharge Rewards for EV Customers for in New York City
SmartCharge New York is an innovative program managed by FleetCarma in partnership with Con Edison. The program was designed to help EV owners reduce the cost of EV charging and enhance electric grid efficiency and resiliency – making service more reliable for everyone. Through FleetCarma's SmartCharge platform, EV Owners in the Con Edison service territory can track EV stats and automatically earn rewards each month when charging during off-peak hours and staying clear of summer peak hours. Quantifiable load shift behaviors have been observed through this technique and can be contrasted with other approaches tested in similar EV load shaping programs.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how to maintain customer satisfaction in the face of complex technology.
  2. Understand the advantages of monitoring at the vehicle, rather than the station.
  3. Take away tips for tracking stats and incentivizing customers.
Sherry Login, Con Edison Sherry Login
Con Edison
Eric Mallia, FleetCarma Eric Mallia
FleetCarma
9:00 am

Rate Options That Support Electric Vehicle Adoption
Consumer perceptions regarding EVs are rapidly changing as the technology evolves and many existing barriers to adoption diminish. Wider availability of sales and service outlets, increased range, lower prices, and a steady growth of charging stations are making the EV a better solution for many consumers. As a result, many utilities are implementing innovative rate structures to encourage EV adoption and manage EV charging loads; This presentation will focus on cooperative experiences and case studies.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how to prepare for increased penetration of EVs.
  2. Understand what rate structures are best suited for encouraging EV adoption.
  3. Take home case study examples of what cooperatives are doing.
Allison Hamilton, NRECA Allison Hamilton
NRECA

The Electric Slide
Clean and distributed generation enabled by investment in wind, solar, and low-carbon sources, combined with technology advancements in storage and electric equipment, are contributing to a power sector transformation that holds opportunities for electric utilities, consumers, and the environment. One of the opportunities emerging from this transformation is beneficial electrification, and the energy industry is abuzz with talk of an electric slide’s potential to make everybody a winner. While there are many programmatic synergies with energy efficiency, it is not yet apparent how beneficial electrification will be choreographed economy-wide. Will beneficial electrification strategies become the next generation of utility energy efficiency programs or does the transformation we are witnessing require a different approach?

Robin Lisowski, Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation Robin Lisowski
Wisconsin Energy Conservation Corporation
9:30 am

Rolling Out Time-of-Use Plans: Customer Engagement Lessons from the West Coast

Optimizing the Customer Experience for Time-of-Use Automatic Transition
Pacific Gas & Electric Company (PG&E) automatically transitioned 150,000 tiered rate customers to a Time-of-Use (TOU) rate in April 2018 as Phase 1 of its wider rollout to support California’s commitment to clean energy. Phase 1 aimed to inform marketing, education, and outreach (ME&O) optimization efforts prior to full rollout as well to provide direction for operational adjustments affecting the customer experience. Customers were randomly assigned to various ME&O test groups, allowing testing of messaging formats, content, and frequency. Research Into Action partnered with PG&E to evaluate the Phase 1 transition through a comprehensive methodology strategy. This included quantitative surveys with ~3,500 customers, qualitative focus groups, in-depth interviews, and online bulletin boards with customers. This presentation will cover initial findings from all data collection efforts and explore the impact of the automatic TOU transition on customer awareness, understanding, satisfaction, engagement, opt-out rates, and more.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Take home the best ways to inform residential customers of automatic TOU transition.
  2. Understand various ways to effectively evaluate the effectiveness of your TOU default ME&O efforts.
  3. Learn which ME&O strategies increase and which ones decrease TOU opt-out rates.
Carrie Lawrence, Pacific Gas & Electric Company Carrie Lawrence
Pacific Gas & Electric Company
Merlyn Xavier, Pacific Gas & Electric Co. Merlyn Xavier
Pacific Gas & Electric Co.
Jordan Folks, Research Into Action Jordan Folks
Research Into Action
Benn Messer, Research Into Action Benn Messer
Research Into Action

Insights on PGE's Large-Scale Residential Peak Pricing Pilot
This presentation will update the evaluation of Portland General Electric’s (PGE) Flex Pricing Pilot Program presented at the 36th PLMA Conference. Between 2016 and 2018, PGE tested 12 different residential retail rate and behavior-based demand response treatments. The pilot operated in summer and winter and enrolled approximately 16,000 customers. The evaluation involved analysis of customer interval consumption data, interviews with utility and implementation contractor managers, and surveys with pilot customers.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn why framing the participation decision as an opt-out choice by defaulting customers into treatment has large and lasting effects on customer participation.
  2. Understand why larger rebates did not yield more savings.
Jim Stewart, Cadmus Jim Stewart
Cadmus
 

Track 2

Nick Corsetti, National Grid Co-Chair Nick Corsetti
National Grid
Dain Nestel, ecobee Co-Chair Dain Nestel
ecobee
8:30 am

Demand on Demand—The Latest Customer Engagement Challenge
The flat or declining load forecast coupled with a declining load shape due to solar is forcing utilities to take a fresh look at rate structures, moving away from flat or tiered rates to TOU and demand rates. This residential demand rate pilot looked at both enabling hardware and customer engagement strategies to communicate a complex rate that was both educational and empowering. The presentation covers what has been learned so far in this innovative pilot.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn what enabling hardware approaches made the biggest impact.
  2. Take home a list of communication channels and approaches that worked.
  3. Understand how customers feel about rates and the impact on customer satisfaction.
Lynn England, Apogee Interactive Lynn England
Apogee Interactive

Voice for Utilities
By the end of 2017, 16 percent of adults in the U.S. owned voice assistant devices such as Amazon Echo and Google Home, a remarkable adoption rate considering the short history of the technology. Embedded voice assistant technologies like Amazon Alexa and Google Assistant transform a speaker device into a smart home hub. Voice assistant devices provide a channel for utilities to interact with customers in addition to creating new value stream opportunities for utilities to expand beyond their traditional business.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn about use cases for utilities (regulated and retail).
  2. Explore innovative opportunities for energy retailers and regulated utilities with the advent of voice assistance.
Fei Wang, GTM Research Fei Wang
GTM Research
9:00 am

The Smart Home Study: Strategies for Distributed Energy Resource Management and Control
Single-family residences are the front line in the proliferation of DERs) such as solar roofs, smart thermostats, EV charging stations and storage. However, most DERs operate independently, causing adverse impacts on the distribution grid such as two-way power flows and steep late-day increases in system load. The Smart Home Study shows customers, utilities, and energy service companies how to optimize the operation of DERs to maximize customer and grid benefits.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn most effective utility and customer technology for managing DER.
  2. Understand how different tariffs impact customer DER load shapes.
  3. Take home best practices for orchestrating a variety of DER.
Tyler Sybert, San Diego Gas & Electric Tyler Sybert
San Diego Gas & Electric
Stephan Barsun, Itron Stephan Barsun
Itron

Tapping the Potential of the Smart Home
Over the next five years, the number of smart devices in our homes is expected to increase tenfold. AEP Ohio and Powerley will explore how utilities are tapping into the potential of the smart home, providing their customers greater convenience while generating more demand savings in the process by looking beyond HVAC. The presentation will detail the DR potential that exists across the smart home and outline the components of a “self-sustaining ecosystem".

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Take away case studies for driving deeper engagement in demand management utilizing the smart home.
  2. Learn practical steps to tap into the potential of the smart home today.
David Tabata, AEP Ohio David Tabata
AEP Ohio
Paul Wezner, Powerley Paul Wezner
Powerley
9:30 am

Retail Market Lessons to Take Home

Rich Philip, Duke Energy Moderator Rich Philip
Duke Energy

Using Residential HVAC-Load Control as a Flexible Physical Hedge
Learn how Retail Electric Providers reduced their exposure to high wholesale-electricity prices in ERCOT last summer. Utilizing connected thermostats in the provider’s participating customer homes, they were able to automatically reduce the customers’ HVAC load in response to 5-minute real-time LMPs and strike prices based on the providers’ locational supply positions without impacting customer comfort. Using a rolling load forecast, based on hyper-local weather data and perpetual thermodynamic modeling, the providers were able to optimize day ahead purchases. This approach is more than demand response, it is a way for electricity providers to increase optimization of day ahead purchasing decisions, reduce real-time price risk, and increase opportunities to physically arbitrage price differences between day-ahead and real-time markets, while delivering comfort to customers and increased profitability to providers.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how Retail Electric Providers (REPs) can team with DER practitioners to mitigate price risk while adding value for their customers;
  2. Understand how to quickly respond to locational supply positions without affecting customer comfort.
Jaden Crawford, Whisker Labs Jaden Crawford
Whisker Labs

A New Approach to External Data Sharing for Utilities
Even in states where retail competition is not allowed, there is increasing interest in allowing consumers to have a choice of energy-related services, including information-driven apps. To receive recognition for the value of an energy related service or distributed energy resource a service provider must provide validation. Mass market providers, like home energy management companies, require a simple, frictionless pathway to access the customers' meter data and related energy information. States require third-party service providers be authorized by the customer to ensure privacy. Green Button standards were developed to provide a secure method to permit this data sharing transaction, but the way it is being implemented is not optimal for utilities or third-party providers. This session will discuss a reconsideration of the current approach, and propose a paradigm shift in strategy.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn how sharing process may be stifling innovation and restricting customer choice.
  2. Understand what other industries have done to facilitate secure data sharing.
  3. Gain an understanding of possible solutions and why utilities as well as third-party service providers should need innovation in data sharing.
Robert J. King, Good Company Associates Robert J. King
Good Company Associates
10:00 am

Refreshment Break in Sponsor Lounge

Track 3

Mark Sclafani, Central Hudson Gas and Electric Co-Chair Mark Sclafani, Central Hudson Gas and Electric Jason Cigarran, Itron Co-Chair Jason Cigarran
Itron
10:30 am

Understanding Your SMB Customers
This session will provide a foundation for attendees to improve engagement with their small and medium business (SMB) customers, an often overlooked and under-researched subset of energy consumers. This session will cover how SMB consumers think about energy, their knowledge of energy efficiency and energy management, common barriers to adoption of energy-saving technologies and practices, and what they would like from their relationships with their energy providers. Following the research briefing, attendees will hear examples from the field on how electric utilities and their partners have successfully developed and implemented programs to engage this group of consumers.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Are SMBs interested in engaging in energy?
  2. How do SMBs view their electricity providers?
  3. What programs & services garner the most interest among SMBs?
Patty Durand, Smart Energy Consumer Collaborative Moderator Patty Durand
Smart Energy Consumer Collaborative
11:00 am

Demand Response is the Gateway to Engagement at Austin Energy
Demand Response professionals have long known that DR is a gateway to customer engagement. At Austin Energy, DR has proven to be the gateway to increased customer engagement; Austin’s decade-old program utilizes Schneider Electric’s Energy Profiler Online software for initiating events and settlement. In addition to facilitating curtailment, EPO enables users to access reports and analytics on their energy data. Austin provides customer access to EPO as a benefit of participating in their Load Co-Op program. Over time, how customers engage with the utility and their usage data has changed. What started as a way for customers to participate in demand response events has evolved into customers really understanding and actively managing their energy use all the time, not only during curtailment events. This session will include Austin Energy customers talking about how they are using analytics to understand their energy use in addition to participating in demand response events.

Scott Jarman, Austin Energy Scott Jarman
Austin Energy
Jenny Roehm, Schneider Electric Jenny Roehm
Schneider Electric

Return to Sneaker Net: A Lower Cost Substitute for Automated C&I DR
With an enrollment goal of 55MW the Kansas City Power & Light and CLEAResult team faced a tough task to enroll enough participants in the manual Demand Response Incentive Program for 2018. Learn how they were able to create a model to identify the ideal prospects, utilized multiple different recruiting resources, developed an engineering process to identify curtailment and how they analyzed data to create accurate curtailment amounts. The presentation will walk the audience through how we targeted certain vertical markets and were successful in those markets to achieve the enrollment goal of 55MW of total enrollment.

Angie Boone, Kansas City Power & Light Angie Boone
Kansas City Power & Light
Derrick Miller, CLEAResult Derrick Miller
CLEAResult
11:30 am

Data Center Demand Response Opportunities
The modern economy relies on cloud computing and data centers to enable our thirst for information. Data center energy use represents about 2% of US electricity usage and is growing at roughly 3% annually, while the rest of the industry sees stagnant energy usage. These high-tech facilities are ripe for demand management implementations and represent an intriguing opportunity for demand response. Aside from shifting computationally-intensive processing load, data centers' IT infrastructure, including the uninterruptible power supplies, emergency generation, and thermal air storage characteristics, all provide a possible rapid-demand response, both of the shed variety, and to strategically increase load.

Sean Morash, EnerNex Sean Morash
EnerNex
Dale Sartor,  Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Dale Sartor
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
 

Track 4

Troy Eichenberger, Tennessee Valley Authority Co-Chair Troy Eichenberger
Tennessee Valley Authority
Chris Ashley, EnergyHub Co-Chair Chris Ashley
EnergyHub
10:30 am

Making Your Smart Thermostat Program Smarter
Smart thermostat programs are increasingly commonplace in residential energy efficiency and demand response portfolios, but how are they actually performing on a broad scale? To address this question, E Source has benchmarked smart thermostat programs and characterized the current state of smart thermostat program structures, incentive mechanisms, and evaluation results. This presentation will delve into some of the most challenging questions utilities face in designing, implementing, and evaluating their smart thermostat program by answering key questions such as: Which smart thermostat programs are achieving the highest energy savings and load reductions, and how? What program design features and incentive structures are having the greatest impact? What do customers like and dislike about smart thermostat programs?

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn strategies that utilities have used to increase energy savings and demand reduction in smart thermostat programs.
  2. Understand the most effective incentive methods for customer enrollment and satisfaction.
  3. Gain insights into the customer experience in smart thermostat programs and how utilities are reducing or eliminating pain points.
Clare Valentine, E Source Clare Valentine
E Source
11:00 am

Providing Options: Program Design Focusing on Customer Choice
When considering a new program design for demand response, the Colorado Springs team focused on providing multiple avenues to participation including automated demand response strategies, manual demand response strategies, along with combined energy and demand management strategies to reach the program goals for commercial and industrial customers. These strategies are presented to the potential end use customers to allow for the customer selection of their preferred participation path; In addition to the commercial and industrial program component, an equipment upgrade for existing residential thermostats combined with the ability to provide a BYOT channel allows for a diversified customer mix that will provide multiple avenues to reach the goals of the program; To manage these various components, a singular control system is implemented with various program control attributes to ensure a seamless operation for the utility while providing the necessary forecasting and measurement and verification data required to evaluate the program.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn why allowing customer choice maximizes participation.
  2. Take home multiple strategies for a diversified approach and back up plans to reach goals.
  3. Understand how both financial and non-financial incentives are perceived by the participating customers.
Greg Wassel, Franklin Energy Greg Wassel
Franklin Energy
11:30 am

Voltage Optimization: Distribution Planning Considerations and Demand Savings Potential for an Emerging IDSM Technology
Voltage optimization (VO) efforts are increasingly deployed for energy savings, as well as peak load reductions. Prior studies show that VO reduces peak load and energy use on a circuit by 0.5 to 4%, but the potential for energy and demand savings is highly dependent on circuit characteristics. Key factors that reduce savings include high proportions of commercial and industrial load, grid-connected DERs, high transmission voltage, poor power factors, and low baseline voltage. Implementing a successful VO program requires consideration of these grid characteristics, and program goals (kWh and or kW) can dictate a program's scope. Ameren Illinois and Opinion Dynamics will share grid planning and measurement insights.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Learn where to best apply this VO for distribution planning and energy and demand savings potential.
  2. Assess whether emphasizing peak demand reduction over energy savings could imply significantly different VO deployment plans.
  3. Understand why the potential for energy and demand savings is highly dependent on circuit characteristics given that this is an emerging technology
Tamer Rousan, Ameren Illinois Company Tamer Rousan
Ameren Illinois Company
Lily Brown, Opinion Dynamics Lily Brown
Opinion Dynamics
12 noon

Lunch Buffet in Sponsor Lounge

 

Closing General Session

Laurie Duhan, Baltimore Gas & Electric Co-Chair Laurie Duhan
Baltimore Gas & Electric
Joe Childs, Eaton Co-Chair Joe Childs
Eaton
1:00 pm

Three Utility Approaches to Gas Demand Response
Utilities are just starting to use Demand Response to manage gas system constraints; Con Edison, National Grid, and Southern California Gas Company have all recently launched Natural Gas Demand Response Programs and Pilots. The three utilities will each give an overview of their Gas DR programs and discuss the different approaches they have taken, including the reasons for launching, an overview of the program design, results to date, as well as challenges they face and questions they are looking to answer in the early stages of these programs.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Why did Con Edison, National Grid and Southern California Gas launch gas DR programs?
  2. What is the basic design of each of the three gas DR programs?
  3. What challenges has each utility faced and what do they hope to learn in the early years of the program?
Brett Feldman, Navigant Moderator
Brett Feldman

Navigant
Charles Umberger, Con Edison Charles Umberger
Con Edison
Owen Brady; National Grid Owen Brady
National Grid
Andrew Nih, Southern California Gas Company Andrew Nih
Southern California Gas Company
1:45 pm

Treating the “Death by 1,000 Pilots Syndrome”: A Discussion
The pace of change in the utility ecosystem continues unabated, yet the processes and practices for validating new technologies and business models that will ostensibly help manage this change remain frustratingly stagnated; This phenomenon challenges vendors, who struggle to introduce new technologies in the face of persistent uncertainty, utilities, who are tasked with understanding how new developments will work at scale, and regulators, who must balance the pace of change with grid costs and reliability, alike; This panel will leverage RMI’s recent work on “Pathways for Innovation” that surfaced best practices in utility pilots, and include a strong dose of audience participation to further the industry-wide dialogue on overcoming the “Death by 1,000 Pilots Syndrome”.

Click to Read More

Learning Objectives:

  1. Understand key challenges to introducing innovation in the utility ecosystem.
  2. Take home recommendations for addressing key challenges to innovation.
  3. Learn strategies and best practices in utility pilot design and execution.
Mike Henchen, Rocky Mountain Institute Moderator
Mike Henchen

Rocky Mountain Institute
Matt Carlson, Aquanta Matt Carlson
Aquanta
Roger Gray, CLEAResult Roger Gray
CLEAResult
2:20 pm Michael Brown, NV Energy

Closing Remarks
Michael Brown, NV Energy and PLMA Chair

2:30 pm

Ice Cream Social in Sponsor Lounge with Utility Load Management Exchange


Utility Load Management Exchange Activities

The Utility Load Management Exchange (formerly the Advanced Load Control Alliance) mission is to promote load control as a viable option for utility deployments in demand reduction, economic dispatch, and/or T&D reliability through a forum for utility staff members to share information on program design, marketing, vendor management, benefit-costs and technology deployments. Learn more at www.ulme.org

View the detailed ULME Fall 2018 Agenda
Tuesday, November 13, 2018
7:30 - 8:30 am ULME Pre-Meeting Breakfast at PLMA
Join us for a quick meet and greet before the conference gets underway.

Wednesday, November 14, 2018, 3:00 - 5:00 pm and
Thursday, November 15, 2018, 8:00 am - 4:00 pm
(Open to Utility Representatives Only, Registration Required)

Wednesday, November 14

3:00 - 5:00 pm

Utility Load Management Exchange Fall 2018 Meeting

6:00 - 8:00 pm

Utility Load Management Exchange Fall 2018 Meeting Networking Dinner

Thursday, November 15

7:30 - 8:00 am

Breakfast Buffet for ULME

8:00 am - 4:00 pm

Utility Load Management Exchange Fall 2018 Meeting (includes breakfast and lunch)